Special Committee - Board of Trustees (2024)

This page provides information on the work of the Special Committee established by the Board of Trustees to examine reported concerns regarding research accuracy in certain scientific articles in which President Marc Tessier-Lavigne is a listed author. We will continue to update this page when there are important developments to share.

Contents

  • July 19, 2023 Conclusion of Special Committee Review
  • April 30, 2023 Update
  • February 22, 2023 Update
  • January 13, 2023 Update
  • December 7, 2022 Update
  • December 2, 2022 Statement

July 19, 2023

Conclusion of Special Committee Review

To the Stanford community,

In December 2022, the Special Committee of the Stanford Board of Trustees committed to overseeing a thorough review of issues related to certain scientific papers on which Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne is a listed author.

The review, which was led by former federal judge Mark Filip and his law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, included an impartial evaluation of the relevant facts and scientific issues by apanelof esteemed scientists. This effort included dozens of interviews, correspondence with scientific journals, interactions with numerous other organizations, analyses by forensic image specialists, and the consideration of more than 50,000 documents. President Tessier-Lavigne offered his fullcooperationand met with the Scientific Panel on multiple occasions.

The final report from Mr. Filip and the Scientific Panel has been shared with the Board of Trustees and President Tessier-Lavigne. The report is available to the publichere. We recommend the community read the report for a complete explanation of the review and its conclusions.

The Special Committee is deeply grateful to the members of the Scientific Panel (Dr. Hollis Cline, Dr. Kafui Dzirasa, Dr. Steven Hyman, Dr. Randy Schekman, and Dr. Shirley Tilghman) for their time, expertise and professionalism; to those in the broader scientific community who gave generously of their time in responding to questions from the Scientific Panel; to the many members of the Stanford community who contributed important perspectives and information; and to Mr. Filip and his colleagues at the Kirkland & Ellis law firm for leading this extremely complex process.

Carol Lam
Chair of the Special Committee of the Board of Trustees, Stanford University

April 30, 2023

Update on Review Progress and Timeline

To the Stanford community,

Kirkland & Ellis and the Scientific Panel have made significant progress since the last update in February. This group’s broad-based and thorough evaluation involves interviews, correspondence with scientific journals, interactions with numerous other organizations, and the review of a significant volume of documents with the assistance of image forensics experts. The Special Committee of the Board would like to provide an overview of the Scientific Panel’s progress, and outline some of the next steps.

As a reminder, the Stanford Board of Trustees convened this Special Committee of the Board in December 2022 to review issues relating to academic articles in which Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne is a listed author. The Special Committee of the Board retained attorney Mark Filip, a former federal judge, and his law firm Kirkland & Ellis to lead the review with rigor and impartiality. In January, the Special Committee of the Board announced the appointment of a Scientific Panel of distinguished scientific experts to assist the review.

As noted in that announcement, the Scientific Panel agreed to conduct a thorough and impartial evaluation of the facts and scientific issues that it determines are relevant — work that is proceeding with all due speed. The Special Committee of the Board is deeply grateful to the panelists — Hollis Cline, Ph.D.; Kafui Dzirasa, M.D., Ph.D.; Steven E. Hyman, M.D.; Randy Schekman, Ph.D., and Shirley M. Tilghman, Ph.D. — for their close attention and unflagging focus to this matter, on top of their own extensive commitments.

The Special Committee of the Board placed no limits on the Scientific Panel’s ability to consider any issues it deems to be within its purview. To date, Kirkland & Ellis and the Scientific Panel have reviewed more than 26,000 collected documents, including scientific papers and lab data, correspondence, media articles, PubPeer posts, and various other materials, with the assistance of experts in image forensics where needed. Their review has also required hundreds of hours of meetings and witness interviews.

Because reviews of scientific and academic conduct are typically very lengthy, the Special Committee of the Board did not set an arbitrary deadline for the Scientific Panel to conclude its important work. However, given the resources devoted to this matter and the Scientific Panel’s progress to date, the Special Committee of the Board believes the Scientific Panel’s work will be substantially complete by mid-July of this year. Kirkland & Ellis will then share the results of its review and the Scientific Panel’s evaluation with the Special Committee of the Board and Stanford’s Board of Trustees, which will ultimately be responsible for communicating with the broader Stanford community.

The Special Committee of the Board continues to welcome information and perspectives from any who wish to contribute to this process. The most direct way to reach the Special Committee of the Board is through the email address board-special-committee@stanford.edu.

Thank you for your continuing interest in this important matter.

Carol Lam
Chair of the Special Committee of the Board of Trustees, Stanford University

February 22, 2023

Progress Update from the Special Committee of the Board of Trustees

To the Stanford community:

Last month we updated you on the progress of the Special Committee of the Board’s review of issues relating to academic articles in which Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne is a listed author. As we shared, the Special Committee retained former federal judge Mark Filip and the law firm Kirkland & Ellis to lead the review, and Mr. Filip engaged apanel of leading scientific expertsto conduct a thorough and impartial evaluation of the facts and scientific issues that it determines are relevant.

Since then, Kirkland & Ellis and the scientific panel have made significant progress in the review, which requires numerous meetings, the collection and review of a large volume of documents, and the assistance of a forensics expert. The law firm and experts are also in the process of interviewing dozens of individuals who have relevant knowledge or information, including about issues raised last week byThe Stanford Daily. In addition, the Special Committee receives many communications, which it reviews and shares with Kirkland & Ellis and the scientific panel.

We have committed to a rigorous review that is as expeditious as possible, in line with established processes and Stanford’s values of excellence and fairness. We review, discuss, and evaluate all information, perspectives, and questions we receive, whether through our email address, formal interviews, or other means and channels.

As a reminder, we welcome input from any parties with relevant information. Mr. Filip will incorporate these insights gathered from the Stanford and broader scientific communities—along with the scientific panel’s evaluation of the relevant facts and questions—into his report to the Special Committee and ultimately the full Board of Trustees. The most direct way to reach the Special Committee is through the email addressboard-special-committee@stanford.edu.

Thank you.

Carol Lam
Chair of the Special Committee of the Board of Trustees, Stanford University

January 13, 2023

Update from the Special Committee of the Board of Trustees

To the Stanford Community,

As we noted in our previous communication, the Special Committee of the Board of Trustees has retained former federal judge Mark Filip and the law firm Kirkland & Ellis to lead the review of questions relating to academic articles in which Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne is a listed author.

Mr. Filip, as part of his review, has engaged a panel of leading scientific experts. The panel has agreed to conduct a thorough and impartial evaluation of the facts and scientific issues that it determines are relevant. Mr. Filip will incorporate the panel’s evaluation into his report to the Special Committee and ultimately the full Board of Trustees.

The members of the scientific panel are (in alphabetical order):

  • Hollis Cline, Ph.D.
    Chair, Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute; Director, Dorris Neuroscience Center, Scripps Research Institute; Hahn Professor of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute; Member, National Academy of Sciences
  • Kafui Dzirasa, M.D., Ph.D.
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator and K. Ranga Rama Krishnan Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Neurobiology, and Neurosurgery, Duke University; Member, National Academy of Medicine
  • Steven E. Hyman, M.D.
    Distinguished Service Professor and Harald McPike Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University; Provost Emeritus, Harvard University; Director of the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; Member, National Academy of Medicine
  • Randy Schekman, Ph.D.
    Howard Hughes Institute Investigator and Professor of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Berkeley; 2013 Nobel Laureate in Physiology/Medicine; Member, National Academy of Sciences; Member, National Academy of Medicine
  • Shirley M. Tilghman, Ph.D.
    Professor of Molecular Biology and Public Affairs Emerita, Princeton University; President Emerita, Princeton University; International Member, National Academy of Sciences; Member, National Academy of Medicine

The scientific evaluation is currently underway, and the Special Committee thanks the Stanford community for its patience in allowing the scientific panel and Mr. Filip sufficient time to complete their work. When appropriate, we will share further relevant updates with the community through this web page and other channels.

As a reminder, those who wish to share their perspectives with the Special Committee may do so using the following email address: board-special-committee@stanford.edu.

Carol Lam
Chair of the Special Committee of the Board of Trustees, Stanford University

December 7, 2022

Update from the Board Special Committee

To the Stanford community:

Last week a Special Committee of the Board of Trustees was convened to oversee a review of issues relating to academicarticles in which Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne is a listed author.

As a community engaged in the creation of knowledge, Stanford University has a longstanding tradition of pursuing excellence in research. This tradition is grounded in ethical principles meant to promote intellectual exploration and rigor. Equally important are our institution’s commitments to healthy debate, discovery, and fair process – the same principles that will guide the Special Committee’s work.

We want our process to be as clear to all members of the community as our principles. For that reason, we are sharing updates in a few key areas of importance.

Responsibility for this review lies with the Board of Trustees.

Because the president of Stanford University reports to the Board of Trustees – which operates in service to the University – it is the Board that bears the fiduciary responsibility of overseeing a thorough and fair review of the questions that have arisen. In this circ*mstance, the Board is undertaking the review so that it will not be conducted by individuals who ultimately report to the president.

As we have previously shared, Trustee Carol Lam will chair the Special Committee. Joining her on the Committee are fellow Trustees Jerry Yang, James Coulter, and Jeffrey Stone. As the review moves forward, the Special Committee may add other members or advisors who can bring additional insights to the Committee’s work.

The Special Committee is engaging outside experts to lead this review with rigor and impartiality.

The Special Committee has retained Mark Filip – a highly-respected former federal judge and former Deputy Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice – and his law firm, Kirkland & Ellis, to lead the review. Toassessand evaluate the relevant scientific facts, Mr. Filip – in consultation with the Committee, as well as Stanford University faculty – will engage a panel of leading scientific experts who are highly regarded in the appropriate fields and independent from Stanford University. This expert panel will review the academic articles at issue.

The Special Committee will continue to engage with the Stanford community.

As volunteers in service of the University, we are committed to actively engaging with all members of the community and welcome ongoing feedback and input on our process. We have established this web page to host this and any future communications, as well as an email address for the Special Committee:board-special-committee@stanford.edu. We encourage members of the community to share their perspectives with the Committee via this email address. We will continue to update the community through our web page and other channels when there are important developments.

The review will be rigorous, thorough, and informed by established processes.

This process – and in particular the review by a panel of scientists – will be informed by established processes for such research-related evaluations.

This will be a fair and rigorous review based on all the available facts. We will move expeditiously but thoroughly. We understand the community’s concerns and desire for answers, but a rigorous process will necessarily take some time.We appreciate the community’s understanding in this regard.

The results of the review – including the opinions of the expert scientific panel and the insights gathered from the Stanford community – will be received by the Special Committee and the full Board of Trustees for consideration. The Board will be responsible for communicating the Special Committee’s work to the broader Stanford community.

As always, the Stanford Board of Trustees is guided by the University’s values and commitment to excellence and fairness. Thank you for your patience as we conduct the thorough review that this situation merits, and we will provide further updates on our progress as appropriate.

Carol Lam
Chair of the Special Committee of the Board of Trustees, Stanford University

Jerry Yang
Chair of the Board of Trustees, Stanford University

December 2, 2022

Statement from Jerry Yang, chair of the Stanford University Board of Trustees

The Board of Trustees has noted press reports regarding research accuracy in certain scientific articles in which President Marc Tessier-Lavigne is a listed author. As chair of the Board of Trustees, I am appointing a Special Committee of the Board to examine the facts underlying the allegations, to assess the significance of any findings, and to make recommendations to the full board. The special committee will be chaired by Trustee Carol Lam, who also serves as chair of the board’s Committee on Audit, Compliance, and Risk. I will also serve as a member of this committee, along with trustees Felix Baker, James Coulter, and Jeffrey Stone.

In initiating this review, I want to assure the Stanford community that appropriate attention and resources are being devoted to this matter. The special committee will conduct its work with all deliberate speed. The special committee will engage expert outside advisors to assist with the fact gathering and assessment.

I also want to note that since President Tessier-Lavigne’s appointment in 2016, he has effectively led this university with integrity and honor. I am confident he will continue to do so while we undertake this review.

I ask for the Stanford community’s patience as the board conducts the thorough review that this situation merits.

Jerry Yang
Chair of the Board of Trustees, Stanford University

Special Committee - Board of Trustees (2024)

FAQs

Special Committee - Board of Trustees? ›

When a board of directors considers a transaction in which some of the directors have a conflict of interest, it frequently creates a special committee of independent directors to evaluate the proposed transaction.

What is a special committee of the board? ›

Boards form special committees to supplement the work of standing committees by providing focused, independent attention to specific issues, typically temporarily (in which case they may be called ad hoc committees).

What is the role of a special committee? ›

Select and special committees are often investigative, rather than legislative, in nature though some select and special committees have the authority to draft and report legislation. A select committee generally expires on completion of its designated duties, though it can be renewed.

What is a special committee in corporate governance? ›

An independent committee of disinterested directors formed to act on special matters that may involve a conflict of interest for a member or members of the board of directors.

What are the use of special committees in conflict transactions? ›

Special committees often play a critical role in conflict transactions, such as transactions involving controlling stock- holders, corporate insiders or affiliated entities, including “going private” transactions, or purchases or sales of assets or securities from or to a related party.

What is the difference between a standing committee and a special committee? ›

Standing committees are permanent committees with specific responsibilities outlined in the rules of each chamber. Special and select committees are created for specific purposes, such as an investigation.

What are the four most common board committees? ›

According to Leading with Intent, the most common standing board committees are finance; executive; fundraising/development; and governance/nominating, nominating, or governance and nominating.

Who appoints members of special committees? ›

Standing, Select, and Joint Committees Distinguished House committees are of three distinct types: (1) standing committees, whose members are elected by the House, (2) select committees (also called special committees), whose members are appointed by the Speaker, and (3) joint committees, whose members are chosen ...

How many special committees are there? ›

The Senate is currently home to 24 committees: there are 16 standing committees, four special or select committees, and four joint committees.

What are the three roles of a committee? ›

Common management committee roles and responsibilities may look like this:
  • Organizing board responsibilities as a whole.
  • Creating organizational reports to determine priority.
  • Upholding the overall values of an organization and remaining focused on the mission.

What is special committee meeting? ›

Special Committee Meeting means a meeting of a Special Committee established by Council, convened and held in accordance with section 87 of the Act; Special Committee Meeting means a meeting of the Committee convened under Rule 40(3) or Rule 22(2);

What are common corporate board committees? ›

The Board accomplishes its functions acting directly and through its committees.
  • Audit Committee. ...
  • Compensation & Management Development Committee. ...
  • Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. ...
  • Public Responsibility Committee. ...
  • Risk Committee.

What are the key responsibilities of the corporate governance committee? ›

The purpose of the governance committee might include: oversight and evaluation of board performance; conducting board committee assessments; board member recruitment and nomination; completing annual audits; and meeting compliance and regulatory requirements.

What are the 5 types of committee action? ›

Over time, the amount of legislation considered by the U.S. House of Representatives increased and committees became a permanent way for Members to divide their work. There are five different types of committees—standing committees, subcommittees, select committees, joint committees, and the Committee of the Whole.

What are the four types of committees and what do they do? ›

Q-Chat
  • Standing Committee. Deals with permanent legislative concern. ...
  • Joint Committee. Permanently formed and consisting of members of both houses. ...
  • Select Committee. Temporary committee created for a specific purpose. ...
  • Conference Committee.

What are the four different types of committees and how is each unique? ›

The four types of committees in Congress are standing, select, joint, and conference. Standing committees are permanent committees that are generally more powerful than other types of committees.

What are the 5 committees of the board? ›

VARIOUS COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
  • Audit Committee.
  • Shareholders Grievance Committee.
  • Remuneration Committee.
  • Risk Committee.
  • Nomination Committee.
  • Corporate Governance Committee.
  • Corporate Compliance Committee.
  • Ethics Committee.
Feb 5, 2015

What are the types of board committees? ›

There are generally two types of board committees, standing committees and ad hoc committees. Standing committees (also called operating committees) are those committees that an organization uses on a continual basis.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Saturnina Altenwerth DVM

Last Updated:

Views: 6127

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (44 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Saturnina Altenwerth DVM

Birthday: 1992-08-21

Address: Apt. 237 662 Haag Mills, East Verenaport, MO 57071-5493

Phone: +331850833384

Job: District Real-Estate Architect

Hobby: Skateboarding, Taxidermy, Air sports, Painting, Knife making, Letterboxing, Inline skating

Introduction: My name is Saturnina Altenwerth DVM, I am a witty, perfect, combative, beautiful, determined, fancy, determined person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.